Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-07 18:31:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6662E6E0906C935E262B7073C8B351D0AED3314E9D090CA70F33C69473A6F631
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet and the attached image projects the idea that the referee denounced for manipulation of VAR images favoured Real Madrid, in reality the referee has been denounced for “harming” Real Madrid, thus a misrepresentation of facts. https://x.com/eldebate_com/status/1755186422145753117?s=46

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1755295743982641525
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6662E6E0906C935E262B7073C8B351D0AED3314E9D090CA70F33C69473A6F631
  • createdAtMillis - 1707330692335
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17552957439826415256662E6E0906C935E262B7073C8B351D0AED3314E9D090CA70F33C69473A6F631