Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-01-18 18:15:22 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The first note is good because it provides context. It doesn’t need to be factually incorrect to be misleading and it was important context. The cn guidelines state they are to add helpful context and keep people better informed, which this note does. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/about/introduction

Written by AB0120FC43B7196F11EAD71CACFC4B208B5409846A730E1EBA7F96657B39A071
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1748027727104340443

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1748046438343274697
  • noteId - 1748046438343274697
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - AB0120FC43B7196F11EAD71CACFC4B208B5409846A730E1EBA7F96657B39A071 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1705601722690
  • tweetId - 1748027727104340443
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The first note is good because it provides context. It doesn’t need to be factually incorrect to be misleading and it was important context. The cn guidelines state they are to add helpful context and keep people better informed, which this note does. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/about/introduction

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2024-01-18 18:15:22 UTC
(1705601722690)
2024-01-18 21:37:11 UTC
(1705613831753)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-01-19 12:24:59 UTC
(1705667099335)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2024-01-18 21:37:11 UTC
(1705613831753)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-01-18 19:14:25 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 18:43:23 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 17:44:05 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 17:22:10 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 15:19:15 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 12:41:02 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 12:19:55 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-19 05:10:08 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 18:37:52 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 18:33:11 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 17:18:30 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 17:09:09 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 17:04:05 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 16:01:35 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 15:22:20 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 13:29:41 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 13:01:09 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 12:25:16 -0600 Rating Details
2024-01-18 12:16:30 -0600 Rating Details