Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-18 23:09:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8044CCF40F66AE07CB5E5D514040C4A8087578157AE08768E55CB316425D34DC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The first note is good because it provides context. It doesn’t need to be factually incorrect to be misleading and it was important context. The cn guidelines state they are to add helpful context and keep people better informed, which this note does. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/about/introduction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748046438343274697
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8044CCF40F66AE07CB5E5D514040C4A8087578157AE08768E55CB316425D34DC
  • createdAtMillis - 1705619349973
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17480464383432746978044CCF40F66AE07CB5E5D514040C4A8087578157AE08768E55CB316425D34DC