Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-18 18:25:16 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CDE67857C6EFC5A006418DD1095DC60E7BAF787D88DEAFA743928441B35B1C28
Participant Details

Original Note:

The first note is good because it provides context. It doesn’t need to be factually incorrect to be misleading and it was important context. The cn guidelines state they are to add helpful context and keep people better informed, which this note does. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/about/introduction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748046438343274697
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CDE67857C6EFC5A006418DD1095DC60E7BAF787D88DEAFA743928441B35B1C28
  • createdAtMillis - 1705602316729
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1748046438343274697CDE67857C6EFC5A006418DD1095DC60E7BAF787D88DEAFA743928441B35B1C28