Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-18 18:19:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EEED157BC2E9221BE450543D359A85453EBCAC0E1658AD66F88531EF7EFE76AB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The first note is good because it provides context. It doesn’t need to be factually incorrect to be misleading and it was important context. The cn guidelines state they are to add helpful context and keep people better informed, which this note does. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/about/introduction

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1748046438343274697
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EEED157BC2E9221BE450543D359A85453EBCAC0E1658AD66F88531EF7EFE76AB
  • createdAtMillis - 1705601995081
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1748046438343274697EEED157BC2E9221BE450543D359A85453EBCAC0E1658AD66F88531EF7EFE76AB