Birdwatch Note
2023-12-11 10:13:49 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The existing critical notes both include the phrase "no evidence," which is an argument from ignorance, and is also incorrect, because there is substantial evidence, when the proper definition of 'evidence' is applied. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/evidence
Written by 5D3EAE61A6A8F9578CB0FBBB300024AAA53C3E3E6443E23456D695B8BFDB96E0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1734039457173504381
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1734154513819242590
- noteId - 1734154513819242590
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5D3EAE61A6A8F9578CB0FBBB300024AAA53C3E3E6443E23456D695B8BFDB96E0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1702289629786
- tweetId - 1734039457173504381
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. The existing critical notes both include the phrase "no evidence," which is an argument from ignorance, and is also incorrect, because there is substantial evidence, when the proper definition of 'evidence' is applied. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/evidence
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-12-11 10:13:49 UTC (1702289629786) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-12-12 03:28:18 UTC (1702351698848) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-12-11 15:56:15 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 13:37:19 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 11:35:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 10:40:13 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 08:56:55 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 08:24:32 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 08:01:52 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 07:53:23 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 07:17:03 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 06:34:41 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 05:52:26 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 05:34:22 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 04:37:34 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 04:24:53 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-11 18:33:01 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-12-17 10:32:39 -0600 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-01-07 04:54:40 -0600 | Rating Details |