Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 14:01:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 306C6CF8917365FDEC354FA39009BEBB0B3D6440D7E7766D7C38CFB0C7C4E93E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The existing critical notes both include the phrase "no evidence," which is an argument from ignorance, and is also incorrect, because there is substantial evidence, when the proper definition of 'evidence' is applied. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/evidence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734154513819242590
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 306C6CF8917365FDEC354FA39009BEBB0B3D6440D7E7766D7C38CFB0C7C4E93E
  • createdAtMillis - 1702303312942
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1734154513819242590306C6CF8917365FDEC354FA39009BEBB0B3D6440D7E7766D7C38CFB0C7C4E93E