Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 10:24:53 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2B74314DD2EB99FF0DE4FBEC48A13B9EB2F0D81E1DAA21F498FB081AF8656A09
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The existing critical notes both include the phrase "no evidence," which is an argument from ignorance, and is also incorrect, because there is substantial evidence, when the proper definition of 'evidence' is applied. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/evidence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734154513819242590
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2B74314DD2EB99FF0DE4FBEC48A13B9EB2F0D81E1DAA21F498FB081AF8656A09
  • createdAtMillis - 1702290293404
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17341545138192425902B74314DD2EB99FF0DE4FBEC48A13B9EB2F0D81E1DAA21F498FB081AF8656A09