Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 10:37:34 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 74407E2B5BA9E0D8ED1ECA7AEB640150A9270AF998CBC178B616D332AE34FC6F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The existing critical notes both include the phrase "no evidence," which is an argument from ignorance, and is also incorrect, because there is substantial evidence, when the proper definition of 'evidence' is applied. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/evidence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734154513819242590
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 74407E2B5BA9E0D8ED1ECA7AEB640150A9270AF998CBC178B616D332AE34FC6F
  • createdAtMillis - 1702291054806
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173415451381924259074407E2B5BA9E0D8ED1ECA7AEB640150A9270AF998CBC178B616D332AE34FC6F