Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-21 23:51:58 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

There is no factual evidence to suggest or confirm that the women portrayed in both videos are the same. In fact, many people seem to disagree and not see a resemblance between said woman and their facial structures/features. Therefore the tweet is falsely presenting as factual https://x.com/nanulsavage/status/1715474500106547669?s=46&t=tF59Mf4i_5mafq-6geS94A

Written by 81589300DB39CCB6F8B84F1CCC54CBA48D10432FE55F8D49283C7F1B98B753E6
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1715878625398985068
• noteId - 1715878625398985068
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 81589300DB39CCB6F8B84F1CCC54CBA48D10432FE55F8D49283C7F1B98B753E6 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1697932318437
• tweetId - 1715414447865410044
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• There is no factual evidence to suggest or confirm that the women portrayed in both videos are the same. In fact, many people seem to disagree and not see a resemblance between said woman and their facial structures/features. Therefore the tweet is falsely presenting as factual https://x.com/nanulsavage/status/1715474500106547669?s=46&t=tF59Mf4i_5mafq-6geS94A