Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-24 23:02:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5533A07EF810BF321DDBABA22672065DB35AA34890AA872FF3D5873118C06AF4
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no factual evidence to suggest or confirm that the women portrayed in both videos are the same. In fact, many people seem to disagree and not see a resemblance between said woman and their facial structures/features. Therefore the tweet is falsely presenting as factual https://x.com/nanulsavage/status/1715474500106547669?s=46&t=tF59Mf4i_5mafq-6geS94A

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715878625398985068
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5533A07EF810BF321DDBABA22672065DB35AA34890AA872FF3D5873118C06AF4
  • createdAtMillis - 1698188534625
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17158786253989850685533A07EF810BF321DDBABA22672065DB35AA34890AA872FF3D5873118C06AF4