Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-11-28 16:08:21 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D837569E9182A140D708FA21B0B69D0E0652DABC095B21E2CAA45D6C76BD5828
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no factual evidence to suggest or confirm that the women portrayed in both videos are the same. In fact, many people seem to disagree and not see a resemblance between said woman and their facial structures/features. Therefore the tweet is falsely presenting as factual https://x.com/nanulsavage/status/1715474500106547669?s=46&t=tF59Mf4i_5mafq-6geS94A

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715878625398985068
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D837569E9182A140D708FA21B0B69D0E0652DABC095B21E2CAA45D6C76BD5828
  • createdAtMillis - 1701187701768
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715878625398985068D837569E9182A140D708FA21B0B69D0E0652DABC095B21E2CAA45D6C76BD5828