Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-22 00:35:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EFEB620B57EB36B2398714473B14FF9A5FBF67E0486E2FA5180FBC847EDDEF86
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is no factual evidence to suggest or confirm that the women portrayed in both videos are the same. In fact, many people seem to disagree and not see a resemblance between said woman and their facial structures/features. Therefore the tweet is falsely presenting as factual https://x.com/nanulsavage/status/1715474500106547669?s=46&t=tF59Mf4i_5mafq-6geS94A

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1715878625398985068
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EFEB620B57EB36B2398714473B14FF9A5FBF67E0486E2FA5180FBC847EDDEF86
  • createdAtMillis - 1697934937963
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1715878625398985068EFEB620B57EB36B2398714473B14FF9A5FBF67E0486E2FA5180FBC847EDDEF86