Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-10-11 11:31:49 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

It is important to note that the pubmed article is a meta analysis reviewing other studies using the same/similar methodology as the posters study. Additionally it labels it's own findings as Moderately confident. So you cannot draw definitive conclusions from either or both.

Written by C1A1B8964D1D3A1D19C518960A8B2D8FF43A642F9D6563CD027C22AEC56F2D36
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1711783556421165382

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1712068483343683633
  • noteId - 1712068483343683633
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - C1A1B8964D1D3A1D19C518960A8B2D8FF43A642F9D6563CD027C22AEC56F2D36 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1697023909779
  • tweetId - 1711783556421165382
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • It is important to note that the pubmed article is a meta analysis reviewing other studies using the same/similar methodology as the posters study. Additionally it labels it's own findings as Moderately confident. So you cannot draw definitive conclusions from either or both.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-10-11 11:31:49 UTC
(1697023909779)
2023-10-11 18:59:00 UTC
(1697050740086)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-10-12 04:03:32 UTC
(1697083412198)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 2023-10-11 18:59:00 UTC
(1697050740086)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-10-11 13:43:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 09:20:19 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 08:03:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 07:04:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-11 06:34:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-12 16:57:24 -0500 Rating Details