Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-11 13:03:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2CEED1569117AACE95F09A79D0CE269986C2491C81D8D0C97EAE7DC20983FAB0
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is important to note that the pubmed article is a meta analysis reviewing other studies using the same/similar methodology as the posters study. Additionally it labels it's own findings as Moderately confident. So you cannot draw definitive conclusions from either or both.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712068483343683633
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2CEED1569117AACE95F09A79D0CE269986C2491C81D8D0C97EAE7DC20983FAB0
  • createdAtMillis - 1697029405368
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17120684833436836332CEED1569117AACE95F09A79D0CE269986C2491C81D8D0C97EAE7DC20983FAB0