Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-11 14:20:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0A5866EDEEEDDB71F8C6D69F0C536CF9BFCD8B9329CB61C43FE3C8BDFB92E05D
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is important to note that the pubmed article is a meta analysis reviewing other studies using the same/similar methodology as the posters study. Additionally it labels it's own findings as Moderately confident. So you cannot draw definitive conclusions from either or both.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712068483343683633
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0A5866EDEEEDDB71F8C6D69F0C536CF9BFCD8B9329CB61C43FE3C8BDFB92E05D
  • createdAtMillis - 1697034019717
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 17120684833436836330A5866EDEEEDDB71F8C6D69F0C536CF9BFCD8B9329CB61C43FE3C8BDFB92E05D