Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-10-11 12:04:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 45EEF9615FE2F3B7D1E98FEA661699D617870D2A9F1EF3ADE39E5A6E9E91C4FB
Participant Details

Original Note:

It is important to note that the pubmed article is a meta analysis reviewing other studies using the same/similar methodology as the posters study. Additionally it labels it's own findings as Moderately confident. So you cannot draw definitive conclusions from either or both.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1712068483343683633
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 45EEF9615FE2F3B7D1E98FEA661699D617870D2A9F1EF3ADE39E5A6E9E91C4FB
  • createdAtMillis - 1697025863625
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 171206848334368363345EEF9615FE2F3B7D1E98FEA661699D617870D2A9F1EF3ADE39E5A6E9E91C4FB