Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-10 01:07:34 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

After not complying with a subpoena issued by a district court (not the Biden DOJ) at the request of an independent special prosecutor (not the Biden DOJ), the company was held in contempt and fined by the court (not the Biden DOJ). A higher court upgrade the ruling on appeal.

Written by F892E8294F86723038D507F3B84F216A79B33A4030006B895CDB489F54717538
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1689398617508085765

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1689443337940742332
  • noteId - 1689443337940742332
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F892E8294F86723038D507F3B84F216A79B33A4030006B895CDB489F54717538 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1691629654761
  • tweetId - 1689398617508085765
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • After not complying with a subpoena issued by a district court (not the Biden DOJ) at the request of an independent special prosecutor (not the Biden DOJ), the company was held in contempt and fined by the court (not the Biden DOJ). A higher court upgrade the ruling on appeal.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-08-10 01:07:34 UTC
(1691629654761)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-08-11 02:40:29 UTC
(1691721629206)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-08-10 03:48:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 03:17:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 03:11:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 02:01:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 01:59:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 01:11:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 00:49:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 00:26:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 00:25:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 00:24:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 00:18:37 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-10 00:15:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 23:42:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 23:42:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 23:34:58 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 23:12:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 23:10:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 23:10:14 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 22:58:16 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 22:34:13 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 22:05:06 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 22:00:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 21:55:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 21:42:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 21:36:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 21:25:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 20:59:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 20:59:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 20:54:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 20:52:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 20:39:28 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 20:31:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 20:24:53 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 20:16:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-08-09 20:14:30 -0500 Rating Details