Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-10 05:18:37 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6E054396662A7F7F7DD533B677F7EAC4AED5D21BBBFC8483FE14725BF25E15B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

After not complying with a subpoena issued by a district court (not the Biden DOJ) at the request of an independent special prosecutor (not the Biden DOJ), the company was held in contempt and fined by the court (not the Biden DOJ). A higher court upgrade the ruling on appeal.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689443337940742332
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6E054396662A7F7F7DD533B677F7EAC4AED5D21BBBFC8483FE14725BF25E15B8
  • createdAtMillis - 1691644717061
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16894433379407423326E054396662A7F7F7DD533B677F7EAC4AED5D21BBBFC8483FE14725BF25E15B8