Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-10 04:34:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F01268394BD2BC81038937106B076B8C4EC2C88AB0A6437BD872E81B12BE1ECC
Participant Details

Original Note:

After not complying with a subpoena issued by a district court (not the Biden DOJ) at the request of an independent special prosecutor (not the Biden DOJ), the company was held in contempt and fined by the court (not the Biden DOJ). A higher court upgrade the ruling on appeal.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689443337940742332
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F01268394BD2BC81038937106B076B8C4EC2C88AB0A6437BD872E81B12BE1ECC
  • createdAtMillis - 1691642098497
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1689443337940742332F01268394BD2BC81038937106B076B8C4EC2C88AB0A6437BD872E81B12BE1ECC