Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-10 05:26:59 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 447FAC9FCC8E6BB0D551D18F0C34637DF1F82AB738550DD181ADA5B0C03EB603
Participant Details

Original Note:

After not complying with a subpoena issued by a district court (not the Biden DOJ) at the request of an independent special prosecutor (not the Biden DOJ), the company was held in contempt and fined by the court (not the Biden DOJ). A higher court upgrade the ruling on appeal.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1689443337940742332
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 447FAC9FCC8E6BB0D551D18F0C34637DF1F82AB738550DD181ADA5B0C03EB603
  • createdAtMillis - 1691645219212
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1689443337940742332447FAC9FCC8E6BB0D551D18F0C34637DF1F82AB738550DD181ADA5B0C03EB603