Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-07 06:11:08 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

"This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology." https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137 and previously "This is a preprint article, it offers immediate access but has not been peer reviewed."

Written by E9E1216A6501D0FB775DDCC53BB8326334C827FDAED70C961503BE92846F4DC9
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1676790986180263937

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1677198542811852803
  • noteId - 1677198542811852803
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - E9E1216A6501D0FB775DDCC53BB8326334C827FDAED70C961503BE92846F4DC9 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1688710268105
  • tweetId - 1676790986180263937
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • "This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology." https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137 and previously "This is a preprint article, it offers immediate access but has not been peer reviewed."

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-07-07 06:11:08 UTC
(1688710268105)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-07-07 18:12:46 UTC
(1688753566047)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-07-07 09:42:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 09:31:04 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 09:15:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 09:12:44 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 09:12:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 09:12:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 08:41:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 08:31:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 08:22:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 08:17:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 07:58:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 07:26:34 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 06:56:47 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 04:48:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 03:52:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 03:43:24 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 01:39:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 01:32:00 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 11:46:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 07:56:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 06:24:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-08 05:07:40 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-07 20:20:56 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 07:34:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 07:30:35 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 05:56:23 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-10 11:13:38 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 22:34:12 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 22:31:27 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 22:22:20 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 22:16:57 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 22:02:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 21:41:02 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 21:19:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 21:17:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 21:07:11 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 21:04:45 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 20:49:46 -0500 Rating Details
2023-07-09 20:44:00 -0500 Rating Details