Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-10 03:22:20 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C56BE56A42826227A986EF0C6C5E90652B5DF2B97F1BF1233ECDE819142664A1
Participant Details

Original Note:

"This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology." https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137 and previously "This is a preprint article, it offers immediate access but has not been peer reviewed."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677198542811852803
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C56BE56A42826227A986EF0C6C5E90652B5DF2B97F1BF1233ECDE819142664A1
  • createdAtMillis - 1688959340824
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1677198542811852803C56BE56A42826227A986EF0C6C5E90652B5DF2B97F1BF1233ECDE819142664A1