Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-07 14:12:44 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 95AE8DCD675A58155936C147B62CA920C40107A74E6D09F8DDB33423B03E779B
Participant Details

Original Note:

"This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology." https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137 and previously "This is a preprint article, it offers immediate access but has not been peer reviewed."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677198542811852803
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 95AE8DCD675A58155936C147B62CA920C40107A74E6D09F8DDB33423B03E779B
  • createdAtMillis - 1688739164611
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167719854281185280395AE8DCD675A58155936C147B62CA920C40107A74E6D09F8DDB33423B03E779B