Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-09 10:56:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9DC0226F9C73EDDB881F457D84E9D525B78C4110F57F93F42152116ACEBB4B50
Participant Details

Original Note:

"This preprint has been removed by Preprints with The Lancet because the study's conclusions are not supported by the study methodology." https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137 and previously "This is a preprint article, it offers immediate access but has not been peer reviewed."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1677198542811852803
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9DC0226F9C73EDDB881F457D84E9D525B78C4110F57F93F42152116ACEBB4B50
  • createdAtMillis - 1688900183374
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16771985428118528039DC0226F9C73EDDB881F457D84E9D525B78C4110F57F93F42152116ACEBB4B50