Birdwatch Note
2023-06-10 06:38:30 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Navy v. Egan pertains to exclusive authority to determine the fitness of individuals for 'security clearances.' It does not recognize a plenary or exclusive power over classified info while in or after leaving office. Legal theory challenges should be in replies. NNN https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/484/518/ https://fas.org/publication/navy_v_egan/ https://sgp.fas.org/eprint/egan.pdf
Written by 0FFA55346FA53B591C5E9C35974F700BF5883CBC590B271397B76195F8E8711F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1667283309041164297
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1667420958150254592
- noteId - 1667420958150254592
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0FFA55346FA53B591C5E9C35974F700BF5883CBC590B271397B76195F8E8711F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1686379110262
- tweetId - 1667283309041164297
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Navy v. Egan pertains to exclusive authority to determine the fitness of individuals for 'security clearances.' It does not recognize a plenary or exclusive power over classified info while in or after leaving office. Legal theory challenges should be in replies. NNN https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/484/518/ https://fas.org/publication/navy_v_egan/ https://sgp.fas.org/eprint/egan.pdf
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-06-10 06:38:30 UTC (1686379110262) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-06-11 02:09:41 UTC (1686449381171) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-06-10 14:16:10 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 12:11:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 09:03:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 06:46:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 03:35:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 02:55:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 02:52:44 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 02:49:11 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 02:26:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 23:12:04 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 22:21:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 21:35:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-10 21:34:42 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-14 04:04:41 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-15 03:24:35 -0500 | Rating Details |