Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-10 17:11:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3AB3EBC4032AB59B267F4BA919DA4F126A3ED7D584E31AE74171DA018460A2B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Navy v. Egan pertains to exclusive authority to determine the fitness of individuals for 'security clearances.' It does not recognize a plenary or exclusive power over classified info while in or after leaving office. Legal theory challenges should be in replies. NNN https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/484/518/ https://fas.org/publication/navy_v_egan/ https://sgp.fas.org/eprint/egan.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1667420958150254592
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3AB3EBC4032AB59B267F4BA919DA4F126A3ED7D584E31AE74171DA018460A2B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1686417076999
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16674209581502545923AB3EBC4032AB59B267F4BA919DA4F126A3ED7D584E31AE74171DA018460A2B9