Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-14 09:04:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B35228C4DD3B3917019592ADD74F1F9C84A626B81C2A208D73CF307CB5BFCF13
Participant Details

Original Note:

Navy v. Egan pertains to exclusive authority to determine the fitness of individuals for 'security clearances.' It does not recognize a plenary or exclusive power over classified info while in or after leaving office. Legal theory challenges should be in replies. NNN https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/484/518/ https://fas.org/publication/navy_v_egan/ https://sgp.fas.org/eprint/egan.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1667420958150254592
participantId -
raterParticipantId - B35228C4DD3B3917019592ADD74F1F9C84A626B81C2A208D73CF307CB5BFCF13
createdAtMillis - 1686733481004
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1667420958150254592B35228C4DD3B3917019592ADD74F1F9C84A626B81C2A208D73CF307CB5BFCF13