Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-06-10 07:55:18 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1D2125EE6C56F7F37A6EDECC269F9395C20390A94F86A34522F86C458FD04E97
Participant Details

Original Note:

Navy v. Egan pertains to exclusive authority to determine the fitness of individuals for 'security clearances.' It does not recognize a plenary or exclusive power over classified info while in or after leaving office. Legal theory challenges should be in replies. NNN https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/484/518/ https://fas.org/publication/navy_v_egan/ https://sgp.fas.org/eprint/egan.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1667420958150254592
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 1D2125EE6C56F7F37A6EDECC269F9395C20390A94F86A34522F86C458FD04E97
createdAtMillis - 1686383718183
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 16674209581502545921D2125EE6C56F7F37A6EDECC269F9395C20390A94F86A34522F86C458FD04E97