Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-14 17:55:38 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

Re: proposed no not needed: while it is presented as an opinion show, even OpEds cite facts and figures to *back up* their opinion. Here, a false claim/fact is being cited, and is misleading/lacking context. Ergo, the other Community Notes are appropriate.

Written by 648BE6EE6413CB1DE7ED8A8A5637E417455500360B820CE820E3A4FD4EC19130
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1646935255721361410
• noteId - 1646935255721361410
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 648BE6EE6413CB1DE7ED8A8A5637E417455500360B820CE820E3A4FD4EC19130 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1681494938200
• tweetId - 1646685843438940161
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 0
• summary
• Re: proposed no not needed: while it is presented as an opinion show, even OpEds cite facts and figures to *back up* their opinion. Here, a false claim/fact is being cited, and is misleading/lacking context. Ergo, the other Community Notes are appropriate.