Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-15 12:00:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7C22161FD9D3C17BDFE276091B59DC52D328D211EA3E7A001E1C51F6C4546DF1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Re: proposed no not needed: while it is presented as an opinion show, even OpEds cite facts and figures to *back up* their opinion. Here, a false claim/fact is being cited, and is misleading/lacking context. Ergo, the other Community Notes are appropriate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646935255721361410
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7C22161FD9D3C17BDFE276091B59DC52D328D211EA3E7A001E1C51F6C4546DF1
  • createdAtMillis - 1681560035191
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 16469352557213614107C22161FD9D3C17BDFE276091B59DC52D328D211EA3E7A001E1C51F6C4546DF1