Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-15 00:04:25 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D4EA906BE64F0CFDAF46E90CE6B806739F575C8D52AB9E5C7CF82FCD9A650D58
Participant Details

Original Note:

Re: proposed no not needed: while it is presented as an opinion show, even OpEds cite facts and figures to *back up* their opinion. Here, a false claim/fact is being cited, and is misleading/lacking context. Ergo, the other Community Notes are appropriate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646935255721361410
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D4EA906BE64F0CFDAF46E90CE6B806739F575C8D52AB9E5C7CF82FCD9A650D58
  • createdAtMillis - 1681517065834
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1646935255721361410D4EA906BE64F0CFDAF46E90CE6B806739F575C8D52AB9E5C7CF82FCD9A650D58