Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-04-14 18:49:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F4F623E5A235BC161670210E83D2BFBF1665F56866C5116BBF08737EA30A8710
Participant Details

Original Note:

Re: proposed no not needed: while it is presented as an opinion show, even OpEds cite facts and figures to *back up* their opinion. Here, a false claim/fact is being cited, and is misleading/lacking context. Ergo, the other Community Notes are appropriate.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1646935255721361410
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F4F623E5A235BC161670210E83D2BFBF1665F56866C5116BBF08737EA30A8710
  • createdAtMillis - 1681498154589
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1646935255721361410F4F623E5A235BC161670210E83D2BFBF1665F56866C5116BBF08737EA30A8710