Birdwatch Note
2023-03-20 17:40:38 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The article describes how doctors and scientists were censored as to the efficacy of Ivermectin, so any medical journals or studies on this subject of its efficacy or otherwise should be considered unreliable. https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/03/did-the-ivermectin-ban-cost-lives/
Written by E6B7B3F231DB222CE243657FE0AC79426AC221AF7CBB932BCF66630F7B7DD1C7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1637373681599954944
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1637871787437334533
- noteId - 1637871787437334533
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E6B7B3F231DB222CE243657FE0AC79426AC221AF7CBB932BCF66630F7B7DD1C7 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1679334038971
- tweetId - 1637373681599954944
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The article describes how doctors and scientists were censored as to the efficacy of Ivermectin, so any medical journals or studies on this subject of its efficacy or otherwise should be considered unreliable. https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/03/did-the-ivermectin-ban-cost-lives/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-03-20 17:40:38 UTC (1679334038971) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-03-21 03:09:46 UTC (1679368186219) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-03-20 15:40:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 14:51:30 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 14:42:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 14:00:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 12:50:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 12:45:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-21 01:45:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-21 00:46:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 19:38:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 14:42:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 15:40:31 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 12:50:08 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 14:00:32 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 12:45:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 19:38:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-21 01:45:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-21 00:46:38 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-03-20 14:51:30 -0500 | Rating Details |