Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-21 00:38:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC2E51AE8C64AE6C0C58E504DFB75E133ECF8F5D0FAC60A72EFC1A51DC264969
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article describes how doctors and scientists were censored as to the efficacy of Ivermectin, so any medical journals or studies on this subject of its efficacy or otherwise should be considered unreliable. https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/03/did-the-ivermectin-ban-cost-lives/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1637871787437334533
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC2E51AE8C64AE6C0C58E504DFB75E133ECF8F5D0FAC60A72EFC1A51DC264969
  • createdAtMillis - 1679359123329
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1637871787437334533EC2E51AE8C64AE6C0C58E504DFB75E133ECF8F5D0FAC60A72EFC1A51DC264969