Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-20 19:51:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 772557C856294D20C6712AC188D93C868B913285E4B4BF6BA8FBA0E7679A03F4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article describes how doctors and scientists were censored as to the efficacy of Ivermectin, so any medical journals or studies on this subject of its efficacy or otherwise should be considered unreliable. https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/03/did-the-ivermectin-ban-cost-lives/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1637871787437334533
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 772557C856294D20C6712AC188D93C868B913285E4B4BF6BA8FBA0E7679A03F4
  • createdAtMillis - 1679341890006
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1637871787437334533772557C856294D20C6712AC188D93C868B913285E4B4BF6BA8FBA0E7679A03F4