Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-20 20:40:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0BD4990BF3255997269B09B79D8F410C961E941E8728A047A9F5A3FF779F297B
Participant Details

Original Note:

The article describes how doctors and scientists were censored as to the efficacy of Ivermectin, so any medical journals or studies on this subject of its efficacy or otherwise should be considered unreliable. https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/03/did-the-ivermectin-ban-cost-lives/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1637871787437334533
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0BD4990BF3255997269B09B79D8F410C961E941E8728A047A9F5A3FF779F297B
  • createdAtMillis - 1679344831613
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16378717874373345330BD4990BF3255997269B09B79D8F410C961E941E8728A047A9F5A3FF779F297B