Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-03-17 11:23:12 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

O debate público e democrático independe de prova suficiente de autoria. Li uma nota da comunidade que fala não existir evidências e nada mais natural que membro do gabinete do político envolvido na acusação faça defesa. Se houvesse evidência seria crime e processo, não um tweet.

Written by 103D26DB2F41BB45695CF853644395E5CDC054675812575F0E6BC46AFF5A1061
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1636337387033751556

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1636689636700422146
  • noteId - 1636689636700422146
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 103D26DB2F41BB45695CF853644395E5CDC054675812575F0E6BC46AFF5A1061 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1679052192268
  • tweetId - 1636337387033751556
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • O debate público e democrático independe de prova suficiente de autoria. Li uma nota da comunidade que fala não existir evidências e nada mais natural que membro do gabinete do político envolvido na acusação faça defesa. Se houvesse evidência seria crime e processo, não um tweet.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-03-17 11:23:12 UTC
(1679052192268)
2023-03-17 16:09:45 UTC
(1679069385214)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-03-19 03:09:38 UTC
(1679195378458)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL 2023-03-17 16:09:45 UTC
(1679069385214)
CURRENTLY_RATED_NOT_HELPFUL

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-03-17 10:37:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 09:28:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 08:08:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 07:40:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 07:05:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 06:28:51 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-19 22:22:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 07:05:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 10:37:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 07:40:09 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 09:28:29 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 08:08:22 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-19 22:22:26 -0500 Rating Details
2023-03-17 06:28:51 -0500 Rating Details