Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-17 11:28:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 34B4CFA95877E497CAA3B3CBE7E13FCD95658DBA4A1DDDDD06348B9D120AE474
Participant Details

Original Note:

O debate público e democrático independe de prova suficiente de autoria. Li uma nota da comunidade que fala não existir evidências e nada mais natural que membro do gabinete do político envolvido na acusação faça defesa. Se houvesse evidência seria crime e processo, não um tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636689636700422146
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 34B4CFA95877E497CAA3B3CBE7E13FCD95658DBA4A1DDDDD06348B9D120AE474
  • createdAtMillis - 1679052531981
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163668963670042214634B4CFA95877E497CAA3B3CBE7E13FCD95658DBA4A1DDDDD06348B9D120AE474