Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-20 03:22:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D5EE04FBC784D70B349F3773C733EA1DC363D8736FDBEF0FC4B45C628090823F
Participant Details

Original Note:

O debate público e democrático independe de prova suficiente de autoria. Li uma nota da comunidade que fala não existir evidências e nada mais natural que membro do gabinete do político envolvido na acusação faça defesa. Se houvesse evidência seria crime e processo, não um tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636689636700422146
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D5EE04FBC784D70B349F3773C733EA1DC363D8736FDBEF0FC4B45C628090823F
  • createdAtMillis - 1679282546089
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1636689636700422146D5EE04FBC784D70B349F3773C733EA1DC363D8736FDBEF0FC4B45C628090823F