Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-03-17 14:28:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 08C4B7C95A6FF890D92EE52D28FAA9520C2F272FE0AD7E2AF1E587EB9181F599
Participant Details

Original Note:

O debate público e democrático independe de prova suficiente de autoria. Li uma nota da comunidade que fala não existir evidências e nada mais natural que membro do gabinete do político envolvido na acusação faça defesa. Se houvesse evidência seria crime e processo, não um tweet.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1636689636700422146
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 08C4B7C95A6FF890D92EE52D28FAA9520C2F272FE0AD7E2AF1E587EB9181F599
  • createdAtMillis - 1679063309919
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 163668963670042214608C4B7C95A6FF890D92EE52D28FAA9520C2F272FE0AD7E2AF1E587EB9181F599