Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2022-06-07 23:53:26 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This trial was a defamation case over the fact that Amber claimed to be a “public figure representing domestic abuse”, she did not allege anything else in the op-Ed and has only disclosed details under oath in cases she did not set in motion. https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/johnny-depp-amber-heard-trial-why-so-many-victimsurvivors-are-supporting-depp/news-story/ac8a9041d1781c22f36c099e57429461?amp https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ive-seen-how-institutions-protect-men-accused-of-abuse-heres-what-we-can-do/2018/12/18/71fd876a-02ed-11e9-b5df-5d3874f1ac36_story.html

Written by E7D7A17139E41AFDE8F4133B4A02C2E3
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1534267970028916737

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1534322673693536256
  • noteId - 1534322673693536256
  • participantId - E7D7A17139E41AFDE8F4133B4A02C2E3
  • noteAuthorParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1654646006404
  • tweetId - 1534267970028916737
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable - BELIEVABLE_BY_MANY
  • harmful - CONSIDERABLE_HARM
  • validationDifficulty - CHALLENGING
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • This trial was a defamation case over the fact that Amber claimed to be a “public figure representing domestic abuse”, she did not allege anything else in the op-Ed and has only disclosed details under oath in cases she did not set in motion. https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/johnny-depp-amber-heard-trial-why-so-many-victimsurvivors-are-supporting-depp/news-story/ac8a9041d1781c22f36c099e57429461?amp https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ive-seen-how-institutions-protect-men-accused-of-abuse-heres-what-we-can-do/2018/12/18/71fd876a-02ed-11e9-b5df-5d3874f1ac36_story.html

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2022-06-07 23:53:26 UTC
(1654646006404)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
3225C91878424BE5A4E171A1BEFF893D297B2D2A26E60CF808B19F513F83727D
2022-06-07 23:53:26 UTC
(1654646006404)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
E7D7A17139E41AFDE8F4133B4A02C2E3

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2022-06-08 10:43:31 -0500 0C91900F7892D8DA899BB85193A8758A Rating Details
2022-06-07 20:21:53 -0500 1141390B9CDF5BFF8C212B27CA71781E Rating Details
2022-06-08 15:49:49 -0500 40207DE86D2E8AD9FD85726281BA80AEBBDF045DC3DC40942C20C778DB8DF934 Rating Details
2022-06-08 15:49:49 -0500 8584AA58BA77CF8B37AF6D0B1ECAF4C9 Rating Details
2022-06-08 10:43:31 -0500 A30E23B01F927C4387616E33DE422C96B4F9A9B45B8ACA619267391F3D77B5A8 Rating Details
2022-06-07 20:21:53 -0500 CBBA22BD679D2B50DEC8F6CC7C72591A37F47DE9C748B3A93B20B0AE51D99E28 Rating Details
2022-06-08 15:49:49 -0500 Rating Details
2022-06-07 20:21:53 -0500 Rating Details
2022-06-08 10:43:31 -0500 Rating Details