Birdwatch Note Rating
2022-06-08 15:43:31 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B8994860E462F1A94C71F3FF7083F5A7415D66AE65A62452736A54150C709437
Participant Details
Original Note:
This trial was a defamation case over the fact that Amber claimed to be a “public figure representing domestic abuse”, she did not allege anything else in the op-Ed and has only disclosed details under oath in cases she did not set in motion. https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/johnny-depp-amber-heard-trial-why-so-many-victimsurvivors-are-supporting-depp/news-story/ac8a9041d1781c22f36c099e57429461?amp https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ive-seen-how-institutions-protect-men-accused-of-abuse-heres-what-we-can-do/2018/12/18/71fd876a-02ed-11e9-b5df-5d3874f1ac36_story.html
All Note Details