Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-06-08 15:43:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0C91900F7892D8DA899BB85193A8758A
Participant Details

Original Note:

This trial was a defamation case over the fact that Amber claimed to be a “public figure representing domestic abuse”, she did not allege anything else in the op-Ed and has only disclosed details under oath in cases she did not set in motion. https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/johnny-depp-amber-heard-trial-why-so-many-victimsurvivors-are-supporting-depp/news-story/ac8a9041d1781c22f36c099e57429461?amp https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ive-seen-how-institutions-protect-men-accused-of-abuse-heres-what-we-can-do/2018/12/18/71fd876a-02ed-11e9-b5df-5d3874f1ac36_story.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1534322673693536256
  • participantId - 0C91900F7892D8DA899BB85193A8758A
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1654703011031
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 15343226736935362560C91900F7892D8DA899BB85193A8758A