Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2021-06-08 16:00:19 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

During the Trump presidency, the record-breaking number of judicial confirmations was a thoroughly discussed topic, spawning literally thousands[1] of articles and think pieces. Criticisms of the nominees aside, there was nothing covert or inherently insidious about it. [1] https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+judicial+appointees&biw=1106&bih=896&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A1%2F20%2F2017%2Ccd_max%3A1%2F20%2F2021&tbm=nws

Written by 2E2C61773CE573A6BE52D191EC5FA19F
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1402294427306139653
• noteId - 1402294427306139653
• participantId - 2E2C61773CE573A6BE52D191EC5FA19F
• noteAuthorParticipantId -
• createdAtMillis - 1623168019496
• tweetId - 1402242335925276674
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable - BELIEVABLE_BY_MANY
• harmful - LITTLE_HARM
• validationDifficulty - CHALLENGING
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 1
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• During the Trump presidency, the record-breaking number of judicial confirmations was a thoroughly discussed topic, spawning literally thousands[1] of articles and think pieces. Criticisms of the nominees aside, there was nothing covert or inherently insidious about it. [1] https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+judicial+appointees&biw=1106&bih=896&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A1%2F20%2F2017%2Ccd_max%3A1%2F20%2F2021&tbm=nws