Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2022-05-23 04:46:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 306C001FB157171615E1F826F2B1DC71
Participant Details

Original Note:

During the Trump presidency, the record-breaking number of judicial confirmations was a thoroughly discussed topic, spawning literally thousands[1] of articles and think pieces. Criticisms of the nominees aside, there was nothing covert or inherently insidious about it. [1] https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+judicial+appointees&biw=1106&bih=896&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A1%2F20%2F2017%2Ccd_max%3A1%2F20%2F2021&tbm=nws

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1402294427306139653
  • participantId - 306C001FB157171615E1F826F2B1DC71
  • raterParticipantId -
  • createdAtMillis - 1653281211010
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1402294427306139653306C001FB157171615E1F826F2B1DC71