Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2021-06-08 23:42:43 UTC -

Rated by Participant: B0974683226ED9AA1A304FC8C617E638636C754070EC696413FFD4854AE471ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

During the Trump presidency, the record-breaking number of judicial confirmations was a thoroughly discussed topic, spawning literally thousands[1] of articles and think pieces. Criticisms of the nominees aside, there was nothing covert or inherently insidious about it. [1] https://www.google.com/search?q=trump+judicial+appointees&biw=1106&bih=896&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A1%2F20%2F2017%2Ccd_max%3A1%2F20%2F2021&tbm=nws

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1402294427306139653
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B0974683226ED9AA1A304FC8C617E638636C754070EC696413FFD4854AE471ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1623195763147
  • version - 1
  • agree - 1
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 1
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel -
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 1
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 1
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 1
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1402294427306139653B0974683226ED9AA1A304FC8C617E638636C754070EC696413FFD4854AE471ED