Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-12-28 16:21:45 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B7CCBEE411CF2E5F5185FFBBC90804635A6E601E642277104A26875B1984FDB2
Participant Details

Original Note:

This statement is wrong both in it's generalisations, in its "routinely" comment and it's extend (fine vs prison). Most importantly: stating matter-of-fact opinion/facts is not prosecuted, Hatespeech & Defamation yes More details on the assumed examples can be found here: https://x.com/Jim_Cornelius/status/2004505110827925594?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 2004711859216162894
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B7CCBEE411CF2E5F5185FFBBC90804635A6E601E642277104A26875B1984FDB2
  • createdAtMillis - 1766938905818
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 2004711859216162894B7CCBEE411CF2E5F5185FFBBC90804635A6E601E642277104A26875B1984FDB2