Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2025-12-27 00:32:07 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

This statement is wrong both in it's generalisations, in its "routinely" comment and it's extend (fine vs prison). Most importantly: stating matter-of-fact opinion/facts is not prosecuted, Hatespeech & Defamation yes More details on the assumed examples can be found here: https://x.com/Jim_Cornelius/status/2004505110827925594?s=20

Written by 07163F3AA68211E6AAA1EBD3FBB0D1FE699A8A68514DF5E3D8E970DA805BE2DA
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 2004711859216162894
• noteId - 2004711859216162894
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 07163F3AA68211E6AAA1EBD3FBB0D1FE699A8A68514DF5E3D8E970DA805BE2DA Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1766795527639
• tweetId - 2004314413789335949
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• This statement is wrong both in it's generalisations, in its "routinely" comment and it's extend (fine vs prison). Most importantly: stating matter-of-fact opinion/facts is not prosecuted, Hatespeech & Defamation yes More details on the assumed examples can be found here: https://x.com/Jim_Cornelius/status/2004505110827925594?s=20