Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-12-27 01:22:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3A42513F3515251653BB774AEFD5B6BFB9430102202E358823AE969FEC6A5F0C
Participant Details

Original Note:

This statement is wrong both in it's generalisations, in its "routinely" comment and it's extend (fine vs prison). Most importantly: stating matter-of-fact opinion/facts is not prosecuted, Hatespeech & Defamation yes More details on the assumed examples can be found here: https://x.com/Jim_Cornelius/status/2004505110827925594?s=20

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 2004711859216162894
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3A42513F3515251653BB774AEFD5B6BFB9430102202E358823AE969FEC6A5F0C
  • createdAtMillis - 1766798554509
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 20047118592161628943A42513F3515251653BB774AEFD5B6BFB9430102202E358823AE969FEC6A5F0C